StandXBUILDERS HUB Back to the Hub

COMMUNITY COLLABORATION MAP

Ideas move.
Community makes them grow.

A verified, evolving sample of how Standers initiated concepts, improved tools and developed research together. It is not a ranking, and inclusion depends on traceable evidence rather than prominence.

Contribution is not always a straight line.Idea → collaboration → evolution → community outcome
01
COLLABORATIVE RESEARCH

StandX · Lighter · Aster

A comparative research contribution credited as a top-tier collaboration in bc1p's official Flower record.

Open the documented outcome
bc1p

Technical research and market-structure analysis

kyodai

Collaborative comparison and shared delivery

02
CREATED → IMPROVED

Flappy Candle

A reusable StandX game used in Brazilian community activations.

Open the documented outcome
Victor

Created the original community game

Jovan

Implemented technical updates and improvements

03
CONCEPT → DEVELOPMENT

StandX RPG

An interactive game that turns the Growth Path into a learning journey.

Open the documented outcome
Victor

Initiated the early educational RPG concept

ThisNotMeme

Led the development and continued the project independently

04
CO-CREATED RESEARCH

StandX vs GRVT

A shared Perp DEX comparison officially selected by StandX.

Open the documented outcome
Victor

Research, framing and comparative analysis

The Yield Ranger

Research collaboration and final publication

ATTRIBUTION STANDARD

Precise credit protects every builder.

The Hub uses specific language instead of treating every relationship as co-creation.

Created byOriginal creator of the delivered work.
Co-created byShared authorship and material joint development.
Concept initiated byOriginated the early idea or direction.
Developed byLed implementation and delivery.
Improved byAdded meaningful updates to existing work.
Inspired byAcknowledges influence without transferring authorship.
Continued byCarried an earlier concept into a new phase.
Maintained byKeeps the project functional and current.

A living record, open to correction.

When stronger evidence appears, attribution can be clarified without deleting the project's history.

Read the methodology